Fertilizer from Urine

From StemNode Lit Reviews
Revision as of 10:03, 8 November 2018 by Raymond RedCorn (talk | contribs) (Created page with " The goal of this outline is to standardize the communication of scientific and technical information. Try to follow the spirit of the outline but delete irrelevant sections...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


The goal of this outline is to standardize the communication of scientific and technical information. Try to follow the spirit of the outline but delete irrelevant sections and alter as needed. If information for a section is not available at the time of page creation, but the section is still relevant, keep the section to indicate the opportunity to contribute to others. Additional guidance is provided in comments that only appear in the source code.

Click "Edit Source" above, then copy and paste the text below the dotted line to start a page for a process node.


Authors:

This system is also called:

Importance

Human urine contributes most of the nutrients to wastewater, but is typically less than 1% of its volume (Maurer, Pronk, & Larsen, 2006). Nitrogen is the most abundant nutrient in urine. Urine contains 89% of the nitrogen that is excreted from the human body (Vinneras & Jonsson, 2002). For treatment plants using activated sludge processes approximately 50% of the energy consumed is for ammonia as N2 to the atmosphere (Goldstein & Smith, 2002). Simultaneously, 1% of world energy is used to turn atmospheric N2 into ammonia for fertilizer and other products (Maurer, et al., 2006). The release of this nitrogen has caused eutrophication of many waterways(Rockstrom et al., 2009). The potential benefits from reusing the nitrogen in urine are substantial. Reusing the phosphorus in urine is equally important. Urine contains 82% of the phosphorus excreted from the body(Vinneras & Jonsson, 2002). Phosphorus fertilizer is mined from rocks, which are non-renewable and are expected to peak in 2030 (Cordell, Drangert, & White, 2009). Phosphorus released into aquatic systems also contributes to eutrophication of waterways (Rockstrom, et al., 2009). Urine offers a renewable source of phosphorus. Higher tech solutions for urine reuse have been explored by NASA, but at an expense (Subbarao, Wheeler, & Stutte, 2000). Lower tech urine reuse has been researched and proven by the world health organization, in soil based agriculture, however this process is open to release of nutrients to the wider ecosystem the same as conventional fertilizers (Schönning, 2001).

Principles of Operation

Urine is often free of pathogens, however pathogens can be present in the urine of unhealthy people, or pathogens can be introduced via contamination from feces during collection. Typically urine is separated at the source by urine separating toilets (aka partitioned toilets) or Urinals. Urine is collected, preferably in undiluted form to reduce the storage volume needed. If urine is allowed to sit, urea will hydrolyze, eventually raising the pH to ~9 (Maurer, et al., 2006). The high pH will inactivate pathogens over time, especially under warmer conditions. Storing for six months above 20°C reduces the risk of contracting an illness to 5.4x10-4 per instance of direct ingestion (Schönning, 2001).

Operating Requirements and Conditions

Storage Conditions

Condition Optimum Operating Range Units Notes
Temperature <20 - °C -
pH 9 8-9.5 - -


Ratios of Inputs to Outputs

The average person excretes 1.25 liters of urine a day(Schönning, 2001). It is difficult to link exact inputs to outputs because storage conditions will determine water loss which can concentrate the nutrients and some nitrogen may be lost as ammonia goes through nitrification and denitrification to form nitrogen gas. The treated urine is typically diluted after storage treatment and dilution rates of one to two parts water per part urine are common (http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/wastewater/urineguidelines.pdf).

Major Nutrients excreted in kg/person/year from people in Sweden and Kenya. Both Urine and Faeces shown for comparison

Nitrogen Phosporus Pottasium
Kenya, urine 2.1 0.23 0.8
Sweden, urine 4 0.37 0.9 - Kenya, faeces 0.3 0.12 0.3
Sweden, faeces 0.6 0.18 0.4

http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/wastewater/urineguidelines.pdf

Concentration of Nutrients in Urine. A dilution of 2:1 is shown for typical soil agriculture application while a dilution of 14:1 is shown to achieve concentrations suitable for hydroponics for most nutrients. All concentrations in g/L Concentration of Urine from (Kirchmann and Petterson, 1995) Typical Concentrations needed for Hydroponics (Raviv and Lieth, 2007)

Nutrient Stored Urine (2:1 Dilution) Stored Urine (No Dilutioon) Stored Urine after dilution of 14:1 Min Concentration for Hydroponics Max Concentration for Hydroponics
Nitrogen 2.2 6.6 0.44 0.05 0.2
Phosphorus 0.2 0.6 0.04 0.005 0.05
Pottassium 1.0 3.0 0.2 0.05 0.2
Sulphur 0.2 0.6 0.04 0.005 0.2
Calcium 0.02 0.04 0.003 0.04 0.2
Magnesium 0.0015 0.0046 0.0003 0.01 0.05
Chlorine 2.37 7.1 0.47 N/A N/A
Zinc 0.00009 0.00027 0.00002 0.00005 0.00005
Copper 0.00015 0.00047 0.00003 0.000001 0.00001
Boron 0.00044 0.0013 0.00009 0.0001 0.0003
Iron 0.00019 0.00056 0.00004 0.0005 0.003
Manganese 0 0 0 0.0001 0.001
Nickel 0.00012 0.0003 0.00002 N/A N/A
Molybdenum N/A N/A N/A 0.00001 0.0001
Sodium 0.96 2.8 0.19 N/A N/A

Mathematical Models

Maintenance and Repair

Maintenance Schedule

Frequency Action Who Performs? Time to Complete
(state the frequency) (state the action) (User, Professional, Manufacturer, Anyone) (Number and unit of time)

Known Failures and Solutions

Problem Symptom (s) Fundamental Cause Solution
A goal the user cannot achieve Usually a measurable or observable attribute Connect to a more fundamental principle Action that can be taken

Warranties

System Variations

Instances of the System

Make Model Dates of Production End of Production Number Produced
(Insert Company) (Insert Model) (State a Date) (State a Date) (State a unitless quantity)

Cultural Significance

Structural Models

Intellectual Property

Regulations